Catherine Herridge is at it Again

[claireokc]

This reporter does a magnificent job of sorting through all the fine detail and bringing out the news. I think it's called investigative reporting, but it's been so long since I've seen it, that it's hard to identify!!!

Here are a couple of very interesting tweets from Herridge:


And


These tweets contain documents that are actually readable in a larger format - here are those documents enlarged - scroll down to see all 3 documents

[claireokc]

We knew this would happen - a liberal will never waste a good scandal!! (Part of the Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky). Therefore they have/had to respond.

Although not named in the Durham filing, the "tech executive aligned with the Democratic Party" has been outed in social media as Rodney Joffe, who responded to Durham's filing.

"Durham says Joffe exploited access to DNS internet traffic for not only the executive office but Trump Tower and Trump’s nearby apartment, and that Joffe had a group of university researchers explore internet data with the goal of establishing “an inference” and “narrative” tying Trump to Russia. Joffe, Durham said, was trying to “please certain ‘VIPs.'

“Under the terms of the contract, the data could be accessed to identify and analyze any security breaches or threats,” Joffe’s spokesperson said. “As a result of the hacks of EOP and DNC servers in 2015 and 2016, respectively, there were serious and legitimate national security concerns about Russian attempts to infiltrate the 2016 election. Upon identifying DNS queries from Russian-made Yota phones in proximity to the Trump campaign and the EOP, respected cybersecurity researchers were deeply concerned about the anomalies they found in the data and prepared a report of their findings, which was subsequently shared with the CIA.

"Durham said his team has “identified no support for” the allegations that the data reflected suspicious DNS lookups by internet addresses affiliated with a Russian mobile phone provider or Yota."

So here's the interesting thing to ask on this response...."...as a result of the hack of the EOP and DNC servers in 2015 and 2016, there were serious national security concerns about Russia." So this meant that the Obummer Admin in 2015 (EOP means Executive Office of the President) and DNC servers (both of these are Democratic targets and we don't know if the Russians were invited to attack or told to attack or shown the way into attack because the Dems are so dim about security to begin with) were being attacked. Then the Democrats used this self-attack as a means by which to justify the hack into the 2016 EOP and Trump Tower, the opposition. So that means that if the FBI finds out that a competitor to my business is a thief, then I can be investigated and slandered as a thief. Huh?! Yeah - that's the logic according to liberals.

Even better is a comment from Hill:


Amazing huh? Let's take this apart:

Trump & Fox are desperately spinning up a fake scandal to distract from his real ones. So it's a day that ends in Y.

It's amazing that she would say this out loud. Isn't this EXACTLY what they did? What was Russia, Russia, Russia? ...and the articles of impeachment v. 1 and v. 2? The projection here is so obvious and unmistakably clear, it's like a neon sign down a dark and scary alley.

The more his misdeeds are exposed, the more they lie.

Whoa - wait a minute....what misdeeds of his (Trump) are being exposed....it's Hillary's misdeeds, the misdeeds of her campaign, the lying and cheating and stealing that she fostered, promoted and executed that is being exposed. What does this even mean? The misdeeds that Trump did were to increase unemployment, keep gas prices low, promote domestic energy exploration, stand up to China, Russia, Rocket Man, and Fausti all at the same time without losing a breath!

For those interested in reality, here's a good debunking of their latest nonsense.

And then there's a quote from one liberal source (Vanity Fair) which then quotes another liberal source (NYT) which is their favorite way of authenticating themselves. This is like being charged with theft and using the person who has been co-indicted with me as a stellar and the most preeminent source of my innocence! Yeah right!!!!

Both responses are typical responses to turn around the blame and fault with the person doing the indictment. Durham is savvy and experienced enough to know that he's close to the target. Most good law-enforcement people know that when you are investigating a robber, and you are looking away from where the goods are hidden, the robber will be laughing and acting like he's smarter than the cops. If, however, the cops are looking very close to where the goods are hidden, the robber will start screaming and diverting the cops' attention, to get them to look elsewhere.

In case we need a reminder here are the Rules for Radicals:
1. Healthcare: Control healthcare and you control the people
2. Poverty: Increase the Poverty level as high as possible. Poor people are easier to control, and will not fight back as long as you are providing everything they require to live.
3. Debt: Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. In this way, taxes must increase, and this will produce more poverty.
4. Gun Control: Remove the ability for citizens to defend themselves from the Government. In that way, you are able to create a police state.
5. Welfare: Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food Housing, and Income).
6. Education: Take control of what children read and to what they are taught in school.
7. Religion: Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8. Class Warfare: Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent, and it will be easier to tax the wealthy with the support of the poor.